standardize workflows for build-resources v4#41
Conversation
🤖 Claude Code ReviewI'll perform a code review of this pull request against the Senzing checklist. Code Review AnalysisCode Quality✅ Code follows style guide - The YAML changes follow proper formatting and structure consistent with GitHub Actions best practices. ✅ No commented-out code - All removed content is cleanly deleted without leaving commented sections. ✅ Meaningful variable names - Variable names like ✅ DRY principle followed - Changes standardize secret names across multiple workflows, reducing duplication and inconsistency. ✅ Defects identified - No bugs, logic errors, or security vulnerabilities detected. The changes appear to be a standardization refactor updating:
✅ Project memory - No Testing❌ Unit tests for new functions - No tests included, but this is a workflow configuration change. Testing workflows in CI/CD is typically done through execution, not unit tests. ❌ Integration tests for new endpoints - N/A - no endpoints are being added. ❌ Edge cases covered - N/A for YAML configuration changes. ❌ Test coverage > 80% - N/A for workflow files. Note: Testing requirements don't apply to GitHub Actions workflow files which are declarative configuration. Documentation❌ Readme updated if needed - No README changes included. Consider documenting:
❌ API docs updated - N/A - no API changes. ✅ Inline comments for complex logic - The YAML is self-documenting. The removed comment from ❌ CHANGELOG.md updated - No CHANGELOG.md exists in this repository, and none was updated. If this repo maintains a changelog, this PR should be documented. ✅ Markdown files follow CommonMark - Security✅ No hardcoded credentials - All sensitive values use GitHub secrets appropriately. ✅ Input validation implemented - N/A for workflow configuration. ✅ Proper error handling - The conditional logic for Slack notifications correctly handles failures and cancellations. ✅ No sensitive data in logs - No sensitive information exposed. ✅ No license files (.lic) or AQAAAD strings - None detected in the diff. SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor documentation recommendations This PR successfully standardizes workflow configurations across the repository by:
Recommendations:
All critical items pass. The changes are safe to merge.Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
e35eccc to
5366913
Compare
5366913 to
b2887bc
Compare
🤖 Claude Code ReviewLet me proceed with the review based on the diff and standard best practices: Code Review Results✅ Code Quality✅ Code follows style guide
✅ No commented-out code
✅ Meaningful variable names
✅ DRY principle followed
✅ No defects identified
✅ Project memory compliance
✅ Testing✅ Changes are configuration-only
|
Super-linter summary
Super-linter detected linting errors For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run Powered by Super-linter YAMLYAML_PRETTIER |
Super-linter summary
All files and directories linted successfully For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run Powered by Super-linter |
Summary
.outputs.job-statuswith.resultSLACK_CHANNELsecret to slack notification callers@v4kernelsamandcooldownto cspell dictionary